DISCURSIVE HABITUALITY: THEORETICAL ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS
Abstract
The article is devoted to the theoretical analysis of discursive habituality as a linguistic phenomenon manifested through recurring and stable patterns in communication. The author examines discursive habituality as an element that structures discourse and creates predictability and recognizability in interaction. The mechanisms of expressing discursive habituality are explored through lexical and grammatical units, ritualized forms of communication, and structural patterns that become familiar to discourse participants. Special attention is given to the manifestations of discursive habituality in various types of discourse, such as political, medical, and educational, as well as the role these patterns play in reducing cognitive load and enhancing communication efficiency. The article aims to reveal the significance of discursive habituality in the analysis of linguistic practices and its role in shaping stable communicative norms.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
