PRAGMATIC AND LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF BUSINESS CORRESPONDENCE TEXTS
Keywords:
Pragmatics, pragmalinguistics, business communication, speech act theory, politeness, addressivity, pragmatic effect.Abstract
This paper investigates the pragmatic and linguistic features of business correspondence texts from a theoretical and functional perspective. It examines how pragmatic categories such as communicative intent, addressivity, modality, and politeness shape written interactions in professional communication. By analyzing contracts and business letters, the study demonstrates that pragmatic meaning in business discourse is not limited to literal semantics but reflects social hierarchy, institutional norms, and interpersonal strategies. The paper also highlights cross-cultural differences between Uzbek and English business communication, emphasizing the importance of pragmatic competence in international correspondence.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
