INTERACTION OF MODALITY CATEGORY IN RUSSIAN AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
Keywords:
Mood, modality, pragmatics, speech acts, functional linguistics, comparative analysis, Russian language, Uzbek language, subjectivity, discourse.Abstract
This article examines the categories of modality in Russian and Uzbek languages through comparative-linguistic and functional-pragmatic analysis. Particular attention is paid to the grammatical nature of the mood category and the semantic-pragmatic essence of modality. Taking into account the typological features of the two languages, the methods of expression, structure, and functional load of the specified categories in speech are analyzed. Furthermore, the relationship between modality and speech acts and communicative strategies is revealed, and their discursive function is defined. The results obtained contribute to identifying similarities and differences in the categories of mood and modality in Russian and Uzbek languages.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
