A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MORPHOSYNTACTIC CLASSIFICATION OF LEXICAL CATEGORIES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK
Keywords:
Parts of speech, English language, Uzbek language, comparative linguistics, morphology, syntax, grammatical classification, typology, translation studiesAbstract
This article provides a comparative linguistic analysis of the classification of parts of speech in English and Uzbek. The study explores the morphological, syntactic, and semantic criteria used in categorizing words into different parts of speech in both languages. It highlights similarities and differences in the traditional and modern linguistic approaches, considering the influence of typological features, historical development, and structural characteristics of English and Uzbek. The analysis aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of cross-linguistic grammatical frameworks and offers insights for language learners, teachers, and researchers involved in comparative linguistics and translation studies.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
